Interpretation/Intention

We interpret things differently based on our experience and desire.

Was that a strike? Is he out at second? Did he double-dribble? That was a foul! Do we call them as we see them, or do we call them as we want to see them?

Recently, ex-FBI Director James Comey wrote in the sand, 86 - 47. Did he mean to remove (86) President Trump (47), or did he mean to eliminate him? It will probably be difficult to prove intent to harm or eliminate, but it was a big mistake to bring attention to it. What was his real intention?

Was it the intention of the Democratic Government and Mainstream media outlets to shield President Biden’s mental/physical capacity? Books are now coming out that admit withholding what we all saw with our own eyes. Not knowing is one thing, but knowing and purposefully withholding information intentionally is criminal. Lying to specific bodies, ala the FBI or in a court of law (perjury) is a crime punishable by law. What about a coordinated lie to the American people? I believe it should be a crime if proven with intent. There should be some responsibility.

Just like the Nixon break-in at the Watergate, the cover-up was bigger than the crime.

The quote, “All’s fair in love and war”, is an idiom that suggests that any means can be used to achieve one’s goals, even if those means are normally considered unfair.

There is currently a war between the Left and the Right where unfairness rules.

Previous
Previous

Disease

Next
Next

Majority Rules